Originality is Overrated
Firefly didn’t get a high enough number of viewers to inspire FOX to keep it going, but the DVD sales numbers seem to be doing just fine.
I’m about to start the third disc in the series which puts me halfway through, so I feel versed enough in the material to make some comments. The material is utter cheese, but in a very endearing way. Campy is the word I’m looking for, but keep in mind I say that as a compliment. It would be more difficult to take Firefly seriously as entertainment if Joss Whedon hadn’t infused it with campy material or humor, one-liners, etc. He offsets the humor with moments of soap opera styled dread and seriousness.
As for the rest of the writing, it seems solid enough. Joss creates some strong dramatic tension between the crew of Serenity and the situations in which they find themselves. The production values of the series could have been a little higher, but I forgive all of it in understanding of budget concerns.
What I get out of the series more than anything is optimism. The supportive, even fanatical fans of Firefly prove that you don’t need big budgets or even the greatest writing credentials to make the next Star Wars. Joss is very much a student of George Lucas bootstrapping and even a writer of Star Trek heritage. He even admits it in recent interviews:
“There’s always the young punk rebelling against his father.I’m rebelling against Han Solo, but if you are going to tell me that Han Solo isn´t the father of Malcolm Reynolds, then I am going to laugh and laugh and laugh. A lot of people liked the first STAR TREK when they were really finding their way, and James Kirk was about taking the time to take his shirt off and getting it done. Kirk was also, I would say, Malcolm’s weird uncle. And both of those franchises became more and more sterile, and less kind off down and dirt. I was rebelling against that kind of TV and science-fiction. At the same time, I owe both of those franchises a huge debt. They are both in my personal, how can they not be ?It’s that classic thing : I’m rebelling against my father and doing everything he doesn’t do, but I think I look like him.”
Creative people often focus on the notion of originality at the expense of everything else. Along with working in a vacuum, many supposed ‘creatives’ will speak of derivation as an evil thing to be avoided at all costs.
I’m often both surprised and disappointed by this Originality Notion. I find Firefly very far from original. As Joss says himself, Firefly and its characters are very much the children of Star Wars and Star Trek, perhaps with a little John Wayne or Sergio Leone western spice. Being derivative is often the source of inspiration for great works.
When I learned that Red Harvest by Dashiell Hammet was the inspiration for Frank Miller’s Sin City among others, I had to read it. After reading Red Harvest I was curious about whether a movie had ever been made, or if there were any plans to make a modern version. Here is what Wikipedia had to say:
“Red Harvest has only been adapted into a film one time, for the 1930 film Roadhouse Nights, starring Jimmy Durante. However, many major elements of the book were changed for the movie, including most of the characters’ names, and the film is not considered a faithful adaptation.It has been frequently asserted–though never officially corroborated–that the plot was the inspiration for Yojimbo, a 1961 film by Akira Kurosawa. Yojimbo was later remade as A Fistful of Dollars (1964), a spaghetti western directed by Sergio Leone and starring Clint Eastwood; A Fistful of Dollars was in turn remade as a 1920s-era “gangster” movie in Last Man Standing (1996), starring Bruce Willis.”
So Red Harvest spawned Yojimbo and Yojimbo spawned A Fistful of Dollars. Kurosawa films have spawned a little something else as well. George Lucas modeled the first half of Star Wars (Episode 4) on Kurosawa’s Hidden Fortress.
So here we have a long history of samurai movies, westerns, and fantasy-science fiction spawned off pulp fiction and detective stories. Not to mention Lucas & Spielberg’s open admission that Indiana Jones was inspired by 1930s serials.
Good things happen to those who emulate.
You don’t have to be entirely original to create good work or even attain a marginal level of success. Being different is more important than being original. The two are not necessarily the same thing if you think about it.
If you can’t get high TV or cable ratings, or can’t be a smashing box office success, there is always the growth of DVD sales to prove you ‘financially viable’ in entertainment markets.
This is an important message to writers everywhere that you don’t have to be a bestseller or smashing success to have some kind of success. Success doesn’t happen overnight. From a creative standpoint you don’t have to be entirely original either, just different enough to grab peoples’ attention. There is a huge market in catering to the Children of Star Wars.
If anything it proves the old adage; “If you build it, they will come.”
Just ask Joss Whedon.
Trackbacks/Pings
Leave a reply
Comments
October 31st, 2005 at 2:08 pm
yessir. probably the easiest way of describing Firefly quickly is to say “imagine Han Solo with a big crew flying around in space” with a man named Jane in the stead of a wookie :)
we’ve talked about this–it’s all been done, so the big task for us creative folks is clever recombination of different sources. Firefly does actually have some pretty clever turns in its historical set up, but the most important and pleasurable thing about the series is its humor and the warmth the viewers feel toward the characters.
would so many TV shows going off the air now be so missed? i think Whedon was able to create the kind of emotional attachment to characters in one season that STNG or like shows only achieved after several seasons.
and on the subject of originality and genre trapping, i really really enjoy this quote by Christoper Nolan, recently known for directing Batman Begins:
“The term ‘genre’ eventually becomes pejorative because you’re referring to something that’s so codified and ritualised that it ceases to have the power and meaning it had when it first started. What I’m trying to do is to create modern equivalents that speak to me of those tropes that have more of the original power.”
sounds like a worthy if not familiar mission, eh? :)
October 31st, 2005 at 2:30 pm
Jack said:
“sounds like a worthy if not familiar mission, eh?”
That’s one reason I wanted to read the classic detective works of Chandler and Hammett. Before I started looking into them I didn’t realize how much they influenced the face of modern entertainment.
Everything from James Bond to spaghetti westerns to Star Wars or Indiana Jones was inspired by classic pulp/noir detective stories or serials.
Recently read that Ian Fleming was a big fan of Chandler and inspired a lot of James Bond stuff.
We’re seeing a lot of circumspection and cyclical reflection when it comes to entertainment and the classic notion of the hero.
Preacher’s conscience appears in the form of John Wayne. Why John Wayne? Because we don’t have heroes like that anymore. The Preacher character makes a comment to that effect a few times in the series.
Star Wars has ended. Joss Whedon being a child of that era has been able to play off some of those tropes, so he will. And the fact Firefly is western themed harkens back to an earlier time.
I don’t think there is much of an interest in the wild west milieu–I think the genre is pretty much dead as a setting, which perhaps explain some of the marketing troubles of Firefly. However, I think people today very much want a classic western hero.
Where is our Humphrey Bogart as Philip Marlowe? Where is our John Wayne?
They’re starting over 007 with Casino Royale and Daniel Craig as the new James Bond.
I think we’re seeing the return to classical heroes. At very least, there is an creative inspiration towards that?