Jan

19

Posted by : E.v.R. | On : January 19, 2006

One of the hardest things in life is to set aside your morals, principles, and values in order to succeed, or just get things done.

This is true in writing just as it is for any other endeavor.

Every writer has a bias or set of principles by which they’ll craft their perfect story. Some will say passionate drafting is the key, others will say logic, believability, plot, and premise are more important.

The key is to know what works, why it works, and how to use it.

I tend to favor certain tools like plot over others such as whimsy or blindly following the muse.

If all you ever use are the same favorite tools over and over again, you will never develop or improve your skills.

Practice makes perfect, but I don’t entirely subscribe to the idea that you just have to keep writing to “get all the bad ideas out.” It is true that you have to fail sometimes in order to succeed. If that’s what is meant by “getting the bad ideas out” then I agree. But quality of my ideas has very little to do quantity or output for me. My inspiration comes from research and understanding literary techniques.

Having a string of bad ideas doesn’t mean you’re going to have good ones next. You have to know what to look for, your tools, and how to use them.

The best literary techniques often share features with other topics like marketing and product design. A creative person, artist, or writer often doesn’t seen the connection between marketing, product design, and creativity but it is undeniably there.

As an example, creative people champion originality. The problem is that every person has a unique voice but that does not make their story or ‘product’ original.

Whereas an expert marketer might look for holes in the market and say, “There’s no product that exists here. Nobody has done this yet! Let’s do it!”

So it is entirely possible for a marketing gimp to be more creative than an author. This is because writers rarely look for holes in the market to fill. They are too concerned with their own little brand of derivitive. “My favorite books are murder mysteries! Therefore, I’m going to write books just like my favorite murder mystery author!”

But they already exist, and hold that position in the market. So what can you do differently?

Look for holes. Look for weakness. Look for things that don’t exist, or exist but are done very poorly. You need to think opportunity. Be a rascal, a weasel, a fox. Think like a military strategist.

But to do that you have to get beyond some difficult mental barriers.

Our human culture is engaged in a battle between knowledge and beliefs. Guess what? Belief wins every time. Ignorance powers belief. Because to believe something, you’ve ruled out the other options and made a decision. Belief is undermined by knowledge. Knowledge opens up the possibilities. It opens doors where you thought all were closed.

As writers we often champion knowledge and put it on a pedestal. Leave belief to the priests, shamans, snake-oil salesmen, voodoo practitioners, witch doctors, etc.

Have we forgotten our own kind? Writers of fiction are in the business of building mythology and belief! We too are the priests and shamans!

We’re selling a world and a set of characters. To sell them effectively we have to make them believable. We have to construct the perfect lie, the perfect sales pitch for our creation.

Learn all the tools available to you. Learn when to use one vs. another. How do you know? Whichever one makes your story better.

Remember that the goal of writing is communication, even in fiction.

When it comes to communication, use what works.

Jan

18

Posted by : E.v.R. | On : January 18, 2006

Ok… it’s time for a little rant.

I’m subscribed to a lot of blogs about writing. In the past few weeks I’ve read some sniveling potshots against Dan Brown and the DaVinci Code.

I’ve heard everything from “It’s awful writing!” to “I want to read writing that’s inspired, passionate! Not like Dan Brown’s novel! Oh sure… it has a good plot, whatever! But it’s not inspired!”

Oh really? Sure, I’ll admit that maybe Dan Brown’s prose could be a little more poetic. What’s the point? His basic stories are entertaining. They’re fast-paced, interesting, and well-constructed.

So why the hate?

I have a theory.

It’s because most writers get all steeped in their own passion and blaze into a fury of writing their ‘inspired’ chapter or two then they burn out and give up.

Or they release a novel that’s shining with flowery prose, but a crap story.

Because they don’t have the discipline to undertake years of research, and focus on the perfect plot, trying to craft the most entertaining story they possibly can.

I know Dan Brown did. I’m sure he had to research every single location he depicts in The DaVinci Code. You can’t write intimate details about the Louvre unless you’ve been there, or have read about it, or taken photographs. Probably all of the above.

I’m sure he spent a good chunk O’ time with his nose buried in historical accounts of Jesus, and the history of the Vatican.

And you can bet your life he took copious notes.

How would I know? Because nobody, repeat, nobody can just pull those kinds of ideas out of their butt. That only comes from diligent research. It’s the kind of synthesis that only comes from a long, careful process of assimilating non-fiction themes and ideas.

And this is where the Dan Brown hatred starts to peeve me.

People act as if he pulled everything out his butt. As if the success of his story was pure luck. As if his lack of flowery prose and artsy sentiment somehow make his stories undeserving of success.

“My prose is better!” or “My writing is more inspired!” a lot of wannabe authors say.

Yeah? Well you’re not Dan Brown. And you probably don’t have the discipline for years of research, gutting and re-gutting your story until it’s nothing but fast-paced action.

Any author worth a grain of salt, and can put envy aside for five seconds and take a look at The DaVinci Code, Digital Fortress, or any of Dan Brown’s novels will realize instantly that the guy put some serious research and editing into those babies.

I’ve griped in past posts how so many authors bore reader to tears for the first quarter of a novel.

They describe the paint peeling from the walls of a location that’s not even central to the story. They describe the grass growing. Then, 50-150 pages in, they finally begin their story.

And I’m sure authors who commit such a heinous storytelling sin wonder why Dan Brown is so successful.

Maybe because he doesn’t do that?

There is so much more to storytelling than just flowery prose. There’s so much more to storytelling than being inspired, or getting the creative juices flowing.

It’s easy to play Le Artisté and pretend that your rough draft is a masterpiece of pure, divine inspiration. It’s another thing to spend years researching, editing and re-editing your story. Then maybe, just maybe, you can be Dan Brown.

He may not be the greatest writer on the planet. But he’s a competent storyteller.

We’re talking about fiction, correct? Entertainment? You can spew all the hatred about Dan Brown that you want, but you can’t deny the fact his stories are entertaining.

Entertainment is the main purpose of fiction. For all their passion and inspiration, more authors should aspire to be entertaining. Leave art to the painters and poets. Besides, if you strive for art you’re going to end up with something that’s pretentious and self-absorbed. I’d much rather read an entertaining story than someone’s failed attempt at art.

Bring on the good stories!

Jan

17

Posted by : E.v.R. | On : January 17, 2006

I’ve had several conversations where the other person expressed the importance of distribution and availability of an author’s book. The sentiment goes; If you just get your book out there in bookstores, people will randomly buy it.

As if getting it out there is all it takes.

We’ve all seen bargain bins, right?

So much for just getting it out there.

I’m going to let you in on something that can be learned in any industry. Independent game developers are always looking for that magical distribution method that will allow them to ditch publishers and retailers. Why? So they can become amazingly rich and famous Game Gods with no publisher, distributor, or retailer strings attached!.

Musicians struggle and dream of the day anyone can buy their CD in Circuit City or Best Buy.

“If I could see myself in the store, then I’ll know I’ve made it!”

Remember the bargain bin?

Distribution is a bankrupt marketing strategy. There are thousands of books collecting dust on the shelves of Barnes & Noble and Borders. I wonder what those authors would say if you approached them with a wide smile and said, “All you need to do is get in bookstores!”

Most of them would probably say, “Big deal. I’m already in bookstores. Tell me something that’ll make my book sell.” They might just punch you the face than respond to that advice. That’s O.K., they’re only the bitter ones. ;-)

Authors rarely have a problem with supply of their books. Their books are collecting dust in some bookstore, or for the self-published, in boxes of a spare room or the garage.

Supply should be the last worry in an author’s mind. Why? Because…

Supply means nothing without demand.

Imagine your worst supply nightmare. Imagine everyone wants your book but nobody can find it anywhere on the planet. Riots are breaking out and mobs of people are foaming at the mouth just to get a copy of your book. Ok, what’s the problem? Being in demand is a good thing, right? That just means every book you print gets snatched up by the rabid masses as soon as it becomes available.

Yet few authors ever achieve that kind of demand. So I’ll say it again; Supply is not a problem.

Supply is almost never a problem. I might even go so far as to say having a supply problem would be a good thing.

If you’ve got a finished book printed and ready to sell, there are many ways to get it to the customer. Most authors have a problem getting people interested in their work.

Focus on creating demand, and supply will naturally follow.