May

25

Posted by : E.v.R. | On : May 25, 2006

Oh the love of pet ideas… is the source of pain for so many frustrated ‘artists.’ I find it amazing that you can argue with other creative people about ideas that simply don’t fit within the themes of their project, or that you can argue about just plain bad or nonsensical ideas, period.

Why do creative people embrace silly things? It’s the love of pet ideas. It’s a hardcore obsession with darlings.

We’d all be better off as writers, readers, media-consumers, etc… if you just please, please, please KILL YOUR DARLINGS.

Just do it. You either have to make it work within the context of your project, or you have to throw it away or save it for later. But you have to make a decision. Your work will be worse off if you don’t, and your work will be better off if you do.

Cast subjectivity aside for a moment. That idea that’s just languishing in your novel, not really going anywhere? Get tough. Get selective. Get mean with yourself.

And then I won’t have to argue with you about why your project isn’t primed for success. If you don’t skewer your own ideas, your audience will. Or I will. Maybe I should an editor?

One thing I don’t understand is why being self-critical, editing yourself, adopting structure, or killing your darlings, are considered compromises of artistic integrity.

You want your work to improve, right? Adaptation is good. A lack of adaptation is… literally, maladaptive. For some reason creative people associate unchanging, die-hard attitudes about their work with artistic integrity. I’m not sure why.

To me that’s the stodgy way of the dinosaurs. It’s also inviting mediocrity. I don’t see how artistic integrity can be keeping everything the same, forever. I don’t see how artistic integrity is defined in that kind of conservative, protective way.

The willingness to hold your work up to the flame is artistic integrity.

The willingness to understand the difference between the wants of your ego and the need of your story is artistic integrity.

We all love to color outside the lines of the coloring book. We allow those kinds of indulgences for children. As adults and professionals, there is nobody waiting to congratulate us for the horrible screw-ups and mediocrity. Nobody will shower us with praise and kisses for creating a blob and calling it art. The real world is willing to love you, but it’s a conditional love. Nobody cares that you had fun coloring outside the lines. The world demands a thesis, a point–they want something that provides meaning or interpretation to their lives.

There is no unconditional love. The world only knows a shrewd, tough love. The way a lionness bites her cubs, or carries them rough by the scruff of the neck. There is very little gentleness out there in the jungle or the savannah. So why do the people of our advanced cultures expect it when unleashing their ‘art’ upon the world? There is no free pass. There is no hiding behind the label of art. There is no hiding behind subjectivity, or relativity. People will judge your work, at some point. If you’ve written a draft, it might as well be you. Be the first, not the last.

You have to earn it. Your novel has to earn it. There is no artistic integrity in refusing to change.

Kill your darlings. Kill your darlings now.

May

24

Posted by : E.v.R. | On : May 24, 2006

Are you stuck? Try these:

  • build up
  • eliminate
  • work forward
  • work backward
  • associate
  • generalize
  • compare
  • focus
  • purge
  • verbalize
  • visualize
  • hypothesize
  • define
  • dissect
  • symbolize
  • simulate
  • manipulate
  • transform
  • adapt
  • substitute
  • combine
  • separate
  • vary
  • repeat
  • multiply
  • invert
  • transpose
  • unify
  • distort
  • rotate
  • flatten
  • squeeze
  • stretch
  • abstract
  • translate
  • expand
  • reduce
  • understate
  • exaggerate
  • That’s a long list of solutions to try when your story is stuck! Courtesy of Hey Whipple, Squeeze This by Luke Sullivan, who got that list courtesy of Conceptual Blockbusting by James Adams.

    May

    19

    Posted by : E.v.R. | On : May 19, 2006

    Do you have a news clip file? I do. It’s actually the basis for a lot of my fictional world. Some of the storys are, anyway. I save stuff about science or tech happenings, as well as some political mumbo jumbo.

    As far as politics, I love to save the stuff that gets my blood broiling. Why? It’s great for working out awful logical extensions. You know, a politican proposes something awful and the sheepish masses blindly go along with it. And then I ask, “What if everyone feels or thinks this is the right thing to do?” It’s an extension of “What if everybody acted that way?” Well, you’d have a pretty messed up world. Worse, a world where nobody even realizes it’s messed up.

    It’s also fun to project that stuff into the future. You know, dumb ideas get proposed. Then they fail… and the first reaction is, “Well, maybe we didn’t spend enough money on it?” So they go back and do Version 2.0 of Crap, and well… everybody is shocked and surprised because lo and behold it’s Crap 2.0.

    I love that kind of stuff. It’s like a big banner floating over planet Earth that says “Everyone here is crazy. Stay away.”

    Thoughtful observations on the ordinary maketh the writer. Because really that’s our job. Take the ordinary things that happen in our world all the time, and spice them up. Murder is ordinary. Politics are ordinary. Stupidity is ordinary. Announcements of amazing new ‘discoveries’ are, sadly, ordinary too.

    It’s our job to pull those things out of the info-glut, the noise, and make sense out of them. To make them interesting, or funny. Or to simply turn things upside-down.

    A writer is part satirist, part scientist. Part philosopher too, no?

    The other kind of news I like to clip is just Odd News. News of the Weird. Why? Because it reminds you to turn off your internal editor. The author’s Judge & Jury. I have one news story I saved, about a pig crashing through a family’s patio into their house, and attacking the family members who lived there. They people involved were actually injured. But it’s the kind of story nobody would ever believe if you made it up as fiction. Or at least, that’s what every writer’s internal voice says.

    “So then the pig crashed through the sliding glass door, shattering it. And it attacked Jane and Bob while they were taking a nap in the bedroom. They were wounded by the pig. The pig kept them trapped in their bedroom for several hours before they could get out and call the police.”

    If you put that in a story, nobody would believe it. It would in many ways defy credibility. Or people would simply think your story was a comedy, a farce. But these things happen in real life all the time. Odd things. The world is strange. Putting a hint of the strange in your work is one way to make it that much more memorable, or in a convoluted sort of way, seem realistic.

    Same is true for the political or sci-fi type news. People often find that kind of stuff too fantastical. It’s fantasy. Unreal. Made up. Truth is stranger than fiction, much of the time–so if you want to avoid creating a dull story just look for the odd news.

    Do you save news stories for inspiration?