<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Writer&#8217;s Wants vs. A Story&#8217;s Needs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/07/14/a-writers-wants-vs-a-storys-needs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/07/14/a-writers-wants-vs-a-storys-needs/</link>
	<description>Infinite Possibilities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:10:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/07/14/a-writers-wants-vs-a-storys-needs/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/07/14/a-writers-wants-vs-a-storys-needs/#comment-179</guid>
		<description>Right, exactly. This is why I don&#039;t feel it&#039;s such a bad compromise. I don&#039;t really understand the &quot;selling out your artistic integrity&quot; thing when you suppress your writerly wants in favor of the story&#039;s needs. Yet, lots of writers still swear by the hedonism of their wants.

Also, the issue of fun gets convoluted. I can have fun by doing what I want. But I can also have fun by being satisfied with my story, and making it the best it can be. It&#039;s true they are different kinds of fun for me, but I think the rewards of a satisfying story outweight the... arbitrary muse.

My mind is always churning with odd thoughts that I like or want, so the fact I don&#039;t let all of them into the story doesn&#039;t seem so much like the crime against art that it&#039;s painted to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, exactly. This is why I don&#8217;t feel it&#8217;s such a bad compromise. I don&#8217;t really understand the &#8220;selling out your artistic integrity&#8221; thing when you suppress your writerly wants in favor of the story&#8217;s needs. Yet, lots of writers still swear by the hedonism of their wants.</p>
<p>Also, the issue of fun gets convoluted. I can have fun by doing what I want. But I can also have fun by being satisfied with my story, and making it the best it can be. It&#8217;s true they are different kinds of fun for me, but I think the rewards of a satisfying story outweight the&#8230; arbitrary muse.</p>
<p>My mind is always churning with odd thoughts that I like or want, so the fact I don&#8217;t let all of them into the story doesn&#8217;t seem so much like the crime against art that it&#8217;s painted to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/07/14/a-writers-wants-vs-a-storys-needs/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/07/14/a-writers-wants-vs-a-storys-needs/#comment-178</guid>
		<description>NO!

Trust me on this.  Sometimes what the writer wants is not what&#039;s best for the story.  Trust me I know.  It took getting this close to getting a publisher interested in my story only to stay the beginning wasn&#039;t strong enough...part of it cause I was too stubborn to change things.

I&#039;ve always known I start novels off slow.  I like lots of background and explanation.  I&#039;ve always put it at the beginning making things slow. 

I&#039;ve learned that there&#039;s a compromise.  I can still have that background, but I can space it out, put it in later...not all at the beginning and still make a story work.  

The funny thing is...I find when I finally do what the novel needs, I really haven&#039;t compromised too much and 95% of the time it&#039;s actually much better than the original version.

And those times when I have to lose a character or sub-plot or even a scene I really like, I remind myself they&#039;re not really &#039;gone&#039;.  There&#039;s always the next story where that character might find a home or that subplot might be just what the story needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO!</p>
<p>Trust me on this.  Sometimes what the writer wants is not what&#8217;s best for the story.  Trust me I know.  It took getting this close to getting a publisher interested in my story only to stay the beginning wasn&#8217;t strong enough&#8230;part of it cause I was too stubborn to change things.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always known I start novels off slow.  I like lots of background and explanation.  I&#8217;ve always put it at the beginning making things slow. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve learned that there&#8217;s a compromise.  I can still have that background, but I can space it out, put it in later&#8230;not all at the beginning and still make a story work.  </p>
<p>The funny thing is&#8230;I find when I finally do what the novel needs, I really haven&#8217;t compromised too much and 95% of the time it&#8217;s actually much better than the original version.</p>
<p>And those times when I have to lose a character or sub-plot or even a scene I really like, I remind myself they&#8217;re not really &#8216;gone&#8217;.  There&#8217;s always the next story where that character might find a home or that subplot might be just what the story needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

