<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m An Egghead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/10/25/im-an-egghead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/10/25/im-an-egghead/</link>
	<description>The Probabilities of Storytelling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 23:30:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Quantum Storytelling &#187; Overachievement</title>
		<link>http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/10/25/im-an-egghead/comment-page-1/#comment-4906</link>
		<dc:creator>Quantum Storytelling &#187; Overachievement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/10/25/im-an-egghead/#comment-4906</guid>
		<description>[...] Trusting, and Training. This is similar to the difference between Generate &amp; Explore I discussed lwhen explaining the geneplore [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Trusting, and Training. This is similar to the difference between Generate &#38; Explore I discussed lwhen explaining the geneplore [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/10/25/im-an-egghead/comment-page-1/#comment-1122</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/10/25/im-an-egghead/#comment-1122</guid>
		<description>Yep! That&#039;s exactly it Nienke. Generate a larger list of ideas before running with one of them. Because if you just run with an idea that doesn&#039;t work out, and you don&#039;t have any alternative ideas to try, you&#039;re going to be stuck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep! That&#8217;s exactly it Nienke. Generate a larger list of ideas before running with one of them. Because if you just run with an idea that doesn&#8217;t work out, and you don&#8217;t have any alternative ideas to try, you&#8217;re going to be stuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nienke</title>
		<link>http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/10/25/im-an-egghead/comment-page-1/#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>Nienke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/10/25/im-an-egghead/#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>So what I get from this is that I should try to come up with a variety of ideas and then explore all the ideas I&#039;ve generated before just going with the first thing that pops into my head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what I get from this is that I should try to come up with a variety of ideas and then explore all the ideas I&#8217;ve generated before just going with the first thing that pops into my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/10/25/im-an-egghead/comment-page-1/#comment-952</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/10/25/im-an-egghead/#comment-952</guid>
		<description>My big problem is always exploring the ideas too early--getting too bogged down in the details of ONE idea, when I should really be generating more alternative ideas and then exploring after I&#039;ve got a better list.

It&#039;s been a big problem for me simply because I didn&#039;t realize I was doing it. I didn&#039;t realize there was a difference between generate &amp; explore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My big problem is always exploring the ideas too early&#8211;getting too bogged down in the details of ONE idea, when I should really be generating more alternative ideas and then exploring after I&#8217;ve got a better list.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been a big problem for me simply because I didn&#8217;t realize I was doing it. I didn&#8217;t realize there was a difference between generate &amp; explore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writer Unboxed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Linktopia: Super Happy Funtime Edition #2</title>
		<link>http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/10/25/im-an-egghead/comment-page-1/#comment-946</link>
		<dc:creator>Writer Unboxed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Linktopia: Super Happy Funtime Edition #2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2006/10/25/im-an-egghead/#comment-946</guid>
		<description>[...] Slushpile muses onÂ why NYT literary critic Michiko Kakutani never seems to like anything published by Knopf . . .Â  found a new blog, the Syntax of Things, wherein there&#8217;s a good post aboutÂ 2006&#8217;s Best Nonrequired American ReadingÂ . . . . Eric&#8217;s come up with an elegant way to explain exploring creative ideas, much nicer than mine, which I call &#8220;bumbling around the draft&#8221;Â . . . . Random Reading is working through P.N. Elrod&#8217;s Vampire Files mysteries.Â  I tell ya, thisÂ website a greatÂ resource for writers who can&#8217;t read all the booksÂ we want because we&#8217;re&#8211;ahem&#8211;working onÂ our own, BUT we need to keep atopÂ publishing trends . . . . Holly Lisle is auctioning off original manuscripts of three of her novels to fundraise for a friend in need.Â  Please help if you can . . . . over at Riskies, Elena Greene decodes contest judging . . . . MJ Rose adds a sixth &#8220;P&#8221; to marketing your books . . . . OK THIS rant is why I love reading Paperback Writer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Slushpile muses onÂ why NYT literary critic Michiko Kakutani never seems to like anything published by Knopf . . .Â  found a new blog, the Syntax of Things, wherein there&#8217;s a good post aboutÂ 2006&#8217;s Best Nonrequired American ReadingÂ . . . . Eric&#8217;s come up with an elegant way to explain exploring creative ideas, much nicer than mine, which I call &#8220;bumbling around the draft&#8221;Â . . . . Random Reading is working through P.N. Elrod&#8217;s Vampire Files mysteries.Â  I tell ya, thisÂ website a greatÂ resource for writers who can&#8217;t read all the booksÂ we want because we&#8217;re&#8211;ahem&#8211;working onÂ our own, BUT we need to keep atopÂ publishing trends . . . . Holly Lisle is auctioning off original manuscripts of three of her novels to fundraise for a friend in need.Â  Please help if you can . . . . over at Riskies, Elena Greene decodes contest judging . . . . MJ Rose adds a sixth &#8220;P&#8221; to marketing your books . . . . OK THIS rant is why I love reading Paperback Writer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
