Nov

22

Posted by : E.v.R. | On : November 22, 2006

Define a viewpoint. Throughout the story I’m currently writing, my hero’s arc, transformation, or ‘inner journey’ is to realize that things are not always perfect, or easy, and they probably never will be. Life is the process of surviving adversity. Sure, life is ‘unfair’ and the world conspires against you, but in the end you either fight to survive, you fight for your rights, your sanity, your freedom–whichever battle you choose, but you must fight.

My hero encounters both a mentor and a mentee. The mentor is of course, older and wiser, and although my hero is slowly realizing that life is simply unfair and he must fight, the mentor is there to teach him that picking your battles is very important. In other words, where my hero realizes that he simply must fight, the mentor can teach a simple fact; How you fight your battles is often just as important as choosing to fight them in the first place.

At the same time, there is a very young and naive character to which my hero plays the mentor. This young character is stuck at a naive stage many of us have been through. It’s the stage where everything is somebody else’s fault, and the world should bend over backwards to satisfy a single individual. It is the naive bitter bus, maladaptive viewpoint. The self-defeating, helpless hand-wringing impatience of youth.

While other writers might define their characters by the character’s habits, quirks, and obsessive personality traits, I’m choosing to define my characters by the purpose their viewpoint brings to the story. Don’t get me wrong, I still have a lot of work to do in defining those odd quirks, and unique individualisms.

But so far the easiest way I’ve found to create a character who actually means something, is to give their perspective relevance and symbolism within the overall themes of the story. Perhaps this may seem a bit obvious, and so I must ask; What tricks do you use in developing characters?

Nov

21

Posted by : E.v.R. | On : November 21, 2006

Milton FriedmanForgive me if this is a little late, as I wasn’t aware. The economist Milton Friedman died last Thursday November 16th at the ripe old age of 94. The bulk of his work in economics and political dialogue was cemented before I was even born. I came across his theories a few years back when I was studying economics as they pertain to logic, truth, and freedom.

Never was there a more rational voice for limiting the role of government, especially in what seems a neverending age where the American and worldwide public seem to crave more and more intrusion from government into their daily lives.

I fear what the world may become without the voices of men like Milton Friedman. I can only hope with his passing that he might grow in fame or even infamy. It is up to the rest of us to carry the torch.

Rest in peace, Milt.

Nov

20

Posted by : E.v.R. | On : November 20, 2006

Okay. I’ll just say it. I’m stuck again. I didn’t fill out a few of my characters enough. Now I’m at a point (in NaNo) where the scenes I need to write involve characters I haven’t given enough thought or depth.

I also got a root canal last week, and dealt with a little jaw tenderness. I took the Vicodin prescribed for only a day… it fogged me out and gave me what I’m dubbing a ‘Vicodin hangover’ — I had the hardest time waking up the next morning and when I did it was with an aching brain with only one solution; More Vicodin. Rather than going down that route, I elected to just take it easy for a couple days.

This weekend I breezed through 361 by Donald Westlake. Yay for discovering old authors you’ve never read, who have a large body of work to explore. I’ll probably review 361 here if only for the fact it represents what I think is the ideal in writing: To the point, sharp, action-packed, and funny.

I also saw Casino Royale which was very compelling for a Bond film, minus a few contrived scenes added for your typical 007 cheese. I agree for the most part with the review over on This Writing Life, especially in why Jason Bourne has become a more identifiable hero for our times than the showing-his-age Bond character. That said, Daniel Craig makes a solid Bond. Better than the previous shall-remain-unnamed pretty boy.

But back to this whole storytelling fiasco. As we blaze, or fail at blazing through NaNo, let’s not forget we do it because we enjoy this grand thing called storytelling. Without that enjoyment, 30 days of beating yourself doesn’t mean anything.

And next time, I promise to be better prepared!