<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Post-Apocalyptic Buffet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2007/04/05/post-apocalyptic-buffet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2007/04/05/post-apocalyptic-buffet/</link>
	<description>Infinite Possibilities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:10:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2007/04/05/post-apocalyptic-buffet/comment-page-1/#comment-6350</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2007/04/05/post-apocalyptic-buffet/#comment-6350</guid>
		<description>Thank You</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your Brother</title>
		<link>http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2007/04/05/post-apocalyptic-buffet/comment-page-1/#comment-5968</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Brother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 01:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2007/04/05/post-apocalyptic-buffet/#comment-5968</guid>
		<description>Hey E,

Sounds like an interesting read. I&#039;ll trade you. I found a copy of &quot;Guns of the south&quot; by Harry Turtledove. I&#039;ve been meaning to send it to you.

- C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey E,</p>
<p>Sounds like an interesting read. I&#8217;ll trade you. I found a copy of &#8220;Guns of the south&#8221; by Harry Turtledove. I&#8217;ve been meaning to send it to you.</p>
<p>- C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric von Rothkirch</title>
		<link>http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2007/04/05/post-apocalyptic-buffet/comment-page-1/#comment-5948</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric von Rothkirch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 20:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2007/04/05/post-apocalyptic-buffet/#comment-5948</guid>
		<description>Re: Simplicity of plot and prose:

The story is kept simple even down to the prose used to tell the story is all an intentional choice. I think it&#039;s wrong to interpret that as a &#039;mistake&#039; on the part of the author.

There are only two main charactrs (father and son) - McCarthy wanted to focus on them exclusively, and that forces a simplicity upon the plot. You couldn&#039;t introduce many other plot threads without introducing a much larger cast of characters.

And the simplicity of the prose reflects the simplicity of the story itself, and the decline of reading &amp; writing in the society.

I see all of it as intentional. You don&#039;t have to like McCarthy&#039;s choice to do that, but I think it would be a mistake to assume he did all that accidentally or out of laziness.

I think it requires a fair amount of discipline to keep things that simple. The natural urge for a writer or creative person is to evolve everything to be complex.

That&#039;s just my take on the simplicity thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Simplicity of plot and prose:</p>
<p>The story is kept simple even down to the prose used to tell the story is all an intentional choice. I think it&#8217;s wrong to interpret that as a &#8216;mistake&#8217; on the part of the author.</p>
<p>There are only two main charactrs (father and son) &#8211; McCarthy wanted to focus on them exclusively, and that forces a simplicity upon the plot. You couldn&#8217;t introduce many other plot threads without introducing a much larger cast of characters.</p>
<p>And the simplicity of the prose reflects the simplicity of the story itself, and the decline of reading &amp; writing in the society.</p>
<p>I see all of it as intentional. You don&#8217;t have to like McCarthy&#8217;s choice to do that, but I think it would be a mistake to assume he did all that accidentally or out of laziness.</p>
<p>I think it requires a fair amount of discipline to keep things that simple. The natural urge for a writer or creative person is to evolve everything to be complex.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just my take on the simplicity thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2007/04/05/post-apocalyptic-buffet/comment-page-1/#comment-5945</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 19:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redchurch.com/quantum/2007/04/05/post-apocalyptic-buffet/#comment-5945</guid>
		<description>I personally didn&#039;t like The Road. The writing was shoddy and the plot was so simple that a 10 year old could easily think up a better one. It seemed to me that it was just a well established author making a few extra bucks by putting together a quick, easy read. It didn&#039;t bring anything new to the Post-Apocalyptic genre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally didn&#8217;t like The Road. The writing was shoddy and the plot was so simple that a 10 year old could easily think up a better one. It seemed to me that it was just a well established author making a few extra bucks by putting together a quick, easy read. It didn&#8217;t bring anything new to the Post-Apocalyptic genre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

