Quantum Storytelling

The Probabilities of Storytelling

Alternatives to Strike

Some ideas:

  • Some of the top showrunners in television form a new broadcasting corporation that offers a strong royalty rate for creators. Oh, but we can’t have that because that’d be starting a corporation, and all corporations are only ever always evil.
  • One of the existing TV networks decides to stick it to the competition, by offering a nice royalty and therefore grabs the better industry talent. Oh, but we can’t have that because competition is bad. Not to mention, most corporations suck at it - so it’s better to not have to do something you suck at anyway. On top of that, the union wouldn’t allow a network to negotiate a good royalty without involving them, so forget about that one.
  • Writers everywhere form a non-union, independent coalition that does nothing other than defend the free agent model, and basic rights. This coalition does not collect dues, and does not form a collectivized, centralized agenda other than promoting independence. Oh, but we can’t have that because that’d be in support of free market competition/capitalism, and those things are evil. Not to mention most people suck at them.
  • Individual writers and/or showrunners negotiate royalty rates individually with the networks they work for. I’m not sure if/why this doesn’t happen already. Probably because individuals aren’t allowed to negotiate their contracts, because the union does it for them?

    Maybe if the union didn’t only do it once every 20 or 30 years, and left it up to the individual, more writers would be compensated better on an individual level? Ya know, maybe there hasn’t been progress since 1988 because the union didn’t do anything other than collect dues? In this entire time, I’m sure writers could have negotiated better salaries and royalties with the networks — IF they were allowed. I know if I wanted more, I’d ask for more. If I didn’t get it, I’d seriously think about changing jobs. That’s how most everything else works, right?

I don’t expect anyone to make any attempts whatsoever towards any of these alternatives. It’s far easier to trust in the Big Brothers & Sisters of the world. I think deep down we all want to be mindless drones, subjected to the agendas of oppressive collectives. We must want it, or we wouldn’t let the collectives — governments, corporations, and organizations (unions) do all the heavy lifting for us.

And yet… we hand them the keys to the city because we simply don’t care. We can’t be bothered with hassles like starting businesses, organizing productions, having books printed and shipped, nor negotiating our own contracts. That’s asking far too much of feeble-minded creative types, isn’t it?

Ok, I’ll curb the sarcasm for a moment. Actually, I don’t think that it is too much to ask for us to do these things. But… and this is a BIG BUT — apparently the world disagrees with me.

I say if you want more, do more. And I’m not just talking about writing. I’m talking about looking after your own interests with some amount of assertiveness, instead of letting others do it for you and rip you off in the process.

 

Popularity: 9%

Trackbacks/Pings

    Comments

  1. Nathania Johnson

    I agree! If writers want royalties stemming from production and distribution - then they need to become producers and distributors!

  2. Eric

    To be clear, I think writers should be able to get royalties. Just not like this!

  3. Nathania Johnson

    Well, yes, that’s a good point. Each writer should be able to negotiate their own contract at the beginning of a job. But walking off the job is not the answer.

    I guess what I meant to say is that these studios are running a business as they see fit and there’s nothing stopping the writers from starting their own business as they see fit.

  4. Eric

    Nathania,

    You are right! That was also part of my point, but one that is harder to communicate. It seems the people that shut down businesses through destructive acts are more often than not the ones least likely to start their own business.

    The risk takers get most of the reward. Taking a paycheck and sitting in the writing room every day is not exactly high risk. The writers are not funding the projects, cutting the checks, and signing on shows which might very well be complete and total failures!

    Networks are a biz like any other - they do their best to manage risk, as that is the nature of the beast.

    The strike seems to say, “Networks are evil and writers are the only important force in the world.”

    Surely you can get more money without having to exude attitudes like that?

Leave a reply