Oct

17

Posted by : E.v.R. | On : October 17, 2006

I’m finishing up The Spike: How Our Lives Are Being Transformed by Rapidly Advancing Technologies. It’s interesting, but more in the trivia kind of way. For a book about the singularity and future technology, it doesn’t cover very many of its subtitled ‘Rapidly Advancing Technologies.’ I would expect the gamut from quantum computing to cloning, and while the book does briefly cover those it spends most of its chapters talking about nanotechnology ‘minting’ and A.I. that could possibly control the minting process. I expected a little more diversity of coverage.

Perhaps the reason why I am most disappointed is I was looking for ideas to mine, and nano minting or self-automated A.I. controlled manufacturing has already been covered in sci-fi, and is relatively well tread territory. Off the top of my head I’m thinking of a couple Philip K. Dick short stories: Autofac and Second Variety.

Something the author Damien Broderick brings up which I thought might be good fodder for a story; The biggest threat to a future society might be boredom. If it were even remotely possible, what would people do to fill their time if the cost of living was zero and everyone had every minute of their waking life to use however they please? Would chaos erupt out of sheer boredom? Would the irrationality of some belief systems only find more fuel for violence in the absence of meaningful life? Or would everyone become a couch potato?

Aside from a few tiny nuggets, I didn’t get much out of Spike. So much for research… but then you can’t win them all. Sometimes digging only gets you dirt!

Jul

01

Posted by : E.v.R. | On : July 1, 2006

How a colony on Mars might work.

From a NASA funded documentary. Too cool.

Jun

06

Posted by : E.v.R. | On : June 6, 2006

Over on The Antick Musings of G.B.H. Hornswoggler there is a decent piece on how the ‘fans’ themselves are killing science-fiction.

If we’re just talking about readers, I agree that the negativity and trolling should be held responsible for some of the ‘destruction.’

If we’re talking about critical dissection among writers, that’s another thing. Getting all nitpicky about a piece of work is one way that writers learn. Until I read Heinlein I had no idea he wrote such bad prose. Not that it matters in the face of the ideas–the ideas are what resonate with people, and why they love the works so much.

Similar can be said for Isaac “The Rambler” Asimov. I found his work to go off too much into the characters’ headspace, which in general is a poor storytelling technique–at the very least overused in his case.

But this is relatively ‘old’ sci-fi, or well-entrenched to say the least. If sci-fi fans are holding back new sci-fi because they simply won’t give it a chance, then yes… that is sad.

But as others may have suggested, don’t read web forums then. Only misery seems to come from online negativity.

Just to be a thorn, the devil’s advocate in me just has to ask… “What if they’re right?”

Is there something wrong with sci-fi these days? If so, what is it?